rent control for Santa Cruz motel
News

Rent Control for Santa Cruz?

As rents soar, advocates from Lower Ocean try to get a handle on the problem

The Sleep Tight Motel, which has closed, is now an apartment builiding on Lower Ocean Street. PHOTO: JACOB PIERCE

Sitting in traffic recently on his way to pick up his son from school, Josh Brahinsky looked around at the cars surrounding him.

Most commuters, he realized were using Highway 1 to get home from work because they can’t afford to live in Santa Cruz.

“People have not stopped working in town, but they’re rapidly stopping living here,” he says.

Along with fellow organizers from the Lower Ocean Neighborhood Assembly, Brahinsky says he has a plan to get a handle on the skyrocketing rents that are changing the fabric of Santa Cruz. “We’re not only a city that’s less creative and less diverse, we also get more congestion,” he says.

The neighbors’ idea is to pass a ballot measure establishing rent control in Santa Cruz, and tie it to the cost of living. They’re also pushing for a ban on short-term evictions so that landlords will have to give a reason before kicking out tenants. Brahinsky says they’re almost done writing the ordinance, which the group has been keeping under wraps, and they’re preparing to make an announcement about it at the “No Place Like Home” event at the Santa Cruz Civic Auditorium on Oct. 19.

Organizer Martin Devecka notes that their group has gotten a surprising amount of buy-in from homeowners who’ve grown tired of seeing their neighbors move away. In a way, rent control is really about creating stability in neighborhoods, Brahinsky says.

The movement first began when the group went door to door in Lower Ocean asking people about their priorities. Rent was far and away the top issue in those conversations.

Lately, there are other ideas out there about how to to address the housing crisis, as well—some of them further along than others. The Santa Cruz City Council, for instance, has been moving toward limiting the number of vacation rentals in town. And former Mayor Don Lane has been working with former county Treasurer Fred Keeley on a possible bond measure to fund new affordable housing. For the Lower Ocean neighbors, reigning in rents seems like the most effective fix—even though previous local efforts have been unsuccessful in establishing rent control, which some see as a political hot potato.

The usually very liberal economist Paul Krugman, for example, is among the country’s more well-known rent control critics. Krugman, a New York Times columnist, wrote in 2000 that “rent control is among the best-understood issues in all of economics, and—among economists, anyway—one of the least controversial.” The policy, he has argued, breeds animosity among tenants—not to mention between tenants and landlords. It creates hotly contested rental markets with long lists of applicants, who can afford the rents but can’t find a place to live, he says.

However, Maya Gupta, one of the local organizers, grew up in Massachusetts and remembers once-infamous rent control laws in the Boston area when she was young that have since been repealed in the name of giving the housing market a shot in the arm. “It’s been just the opposite. There was no change in housing supply when rent control ended,” she says, adding that rents there have since soared.

There’s also a new precedent in the Bay Area for creating rent control; the Lower Ocean neighbors have looked to ordinances in both Mountain View and Richmond while crafting their version, Brahinsky says.

He adds that the “new generation” of rent control laws has proven more effective, although he does wonder what possible changes would mean for people who already have a hard time finding a place to live.

“But working people will have homes!” he says optimistically. “Because people are leaving.”

 

News Editor at |

Jacob, the news editor at Good Times, won the 2014 award for best local government coverage from the California Newspaper Publishers Association. A longtime basketball and football fanatic, Jacob has evolved into a shameless fair weather fan and band wagoner for hot West Coast sports teams. He also enjoys arguing with others about where to find the best burrito in town.

5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Pete Hough

    October 20, 2017 at 3:22 pm

    Property taxes and the 27 lines on School Bonds, etc. is a significant expense. Then it’s left to the property owner to pass this on to the renter.

  2. J. Newman

    October 20, 2017 at 2:21 am

    I own a rental property in Santa Cruz, which I rent to a local teacher at about 25% below-market rent. If rent control passes, benevolent landlords like me would quickly raise rent before it took effect so as not to get trapped. Rent control creates slummy, run-down housing stock, disgruntled tenants and resentful landlords. Why interpolate more government regulation between me and my tenant? Rent control has the opposite effect of its intention and drives prices up.

  3. Nathan York

    October 20, 2017 at 12:23 am

    If I follow Gupta’s line of reasoning correctly: Removing rent control in Boston didn’t increase supply and rents climbed (would love to see citation for this, BTW), therefore rent control in Santa Cruz will work? I’m not buying it, not as simple as that because there are many factors in housing supply, demand, and prices. Clearly Santa Cruz (and the Bay Area in general) managed to create a housing crisis largely without the help of rent control.

    Again and again when economists study this topic they find rent control works in the short term to help a small number of people who can secure and retain a rent controlled unit. The problem is that it makes life more difficult for everyone else, and those who are helped vs. harmed is rather arbitrary. And in the long term rent control reduces housing supply and quality. We can’t ignore hard learned lessons and decades of peer reviewed studies because of a few anecdotal accounts, this would be like ignoring global warming because some place had a record low.

    We can do better than this. The real solution is to build a lot more mid-rise housing in already urban areas. Santa Cruz will likely never be a cheap place to live (hence the need for some subsidized housing), and we cannot expect new supply to quickly lower prices because this crisis has been decades in the making. But over time new supply will stabilize and lower prices making the city more vibrant as more diversity of people can afford to live here.

  4. Matthew Barnes

    October 19, 2017 at 2:48 am

    Yeah. Rent control.

    That’ll work.

    Of course, it’s failed miserably everywhere else, but maybe Santa Cruz is different.

    Right…

    • Jo tobin

      October 19, 2017 at 11:18 pm

      Rent control permanently reduces housing by 20% because once your rent is under market you will never move and it is the moving in and out that creates vacancy for new people to move in. Rents rise until you have about 5% vacancy and then level off because nobody can afford or wants to leave a unit empty it’s kike flushing money down the toilet.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you an earthling? Prove it with logic: *

To Top