Re: “Growing Pains”: I am a rural resident in the Pajaro Valley and am very concerned about decisions being made by the Pajaro Valley Water “Sustainability” Agency that negatively impact rural residents who are on a private well or on a small water system. “Sustainability” criteria is being defined as a groundwater level that goes below the roughly 2015 level, which was at the end of a four-year drought, and then continues below for an additional four years. This would be equal to an eight-year drought. How is that a “sustainable” groundwater level for rural residents who live in the areas and hills upland from the agricultural areas? A few of us are trying to push back, but we need other rural residents to help get the “sustainability” criteria re-defined to a level which protects us … not hang us out to dry. To find out more about how you can help, please send an email to ru******************@gm***.com as soon as you can, before the final decisions are made. Don’t let the proposed “Sustainability plan” negatively affect your water future.
Marla Anderson
Watsonville
This letter does not necessarily reflect the views of Good Times.To submit a letter to the editor of Good Times: Letters should be originals—not copies of letters sent to other publications. Please include your name and email address to help us verify your submission (email address will not be published). Please be brief. Letters may be edited for length, clarity and to correct factual inaccuracies known to us. Send letters to le*****@go*******.sc .
