Snail
News

Opinion: The Wild Story of Snail, One of the Biggest Local Music Legends

Plus letters to the editor

Snail on the cover of Good Times in 1978.

Editor's Note

Steve Palopoli Profile Photo

Before I get into this week’s cover story, I want to announce that thanks to your generosity, Santa Cruz Gives has hit its fundraising goal—with a week to spare. That’s more than $550,000 donated to the 40 nonprofits participating in our holiday charity drive. And what made the biggest impression on me is that just as I was sitting down to write about how even though we’ve hit our first goal, we can’t give up now, we can pull together and make our OMG! goal of $600,000, I found out that we had just received a $10,000 donation to the Animal Shelter of Santa Cruz County Foundation. You guys are way ahead of me.

OK, now back to our regularly scheduled issue. Except nothing is regular this year, including our New Year’s Eve issue. Whereas the cover story would normally be about some great band you can go out and see on New Year’s … well, that’s not where the world is at right now. But even if you can’t go out and see them, Aaron Carnes’ piece is at least about a great band—one of Santa Cruz’s biggest music legends, who have unexpectedly released their first album of new music in 40 years. In the article, he writes about Snail’s reunion show at one of Good Times’ famous Halloween parties at the Cocoanut Grove in the 1990s, and I was at that show. I suspected that seeing them live would be a letdown after all the “Santa Cruz’s most famous band” build-up, but they absolutely lived up to the hype. If you don’t know the wild story of this band, or want to know what brought them together again for a new record, don’t miss this one.

STEVE PALOPOLI | EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

Letters to the Editor

Model Behavior

One of nearly 500 signatories to a petition urging Santa Cruz to adopt a Cahoots-style public safety model, I spent four hours glued to Mayor Cummings’ timely study session about alternative models to police response for nonviolent 911 calls—the vast majority being incidents involving mental illness, homelessness, and welfare checks. 

Community and council were educated about existing city and county programs—none of which are 24/7, with some cutting police response from two police officers to one accompanied by a social service worker. The concluding 1 1/2 hours, Cahoot consultant Ben Climer presented an overview of the cost-, life-, and dignity-saving 24/7 Eugene Oregon emergency response model which handles nearly 20% of 911 calls at 1/3 the cost of police patrols, freeing police, fire, prisons, hospitals, ambulance for critical work. We were told that for $1.5 million we could have one 24/7 Cahoots-style Mobile Crisis Intervention Response team with a medic and a social service worker that could service 100,000 people. (SCPD budget for 2020 is $31 million, 28.1% of the General Fund.)

Council interest and public support was noticeably high. Cynthia Mathews quickly made a motion calling for more city/county discussion—a tactic that moves nothing forward. Martín Bernal pointed out the looming budget deficit. Cynthia and her council clan refused to accept Sandy Brown’s friendly amendment seconded by Katherine Beiers to request a free proposal to find out what the Cahoots consulting fee would be to implement this proven program that could potentially save millions. 

In stark contrast, just a month earlier, with no budget deficit alarm sounded, the same Mathews flock voted to designate $240,000 for a consultant to unravel the quagmire of constructing a new library, 50 housing units and 400 parking spaces, for which costs, funding, and even viability, remain unknown! 

How is it our Council majority favors spending to push a risky development project but are unwilling to simple explore cost-saving measures that would provide improved public health and safety?? Will the new council promote more of the same, with Sandy Brown a lone voice protecting the marginalized? Stay tuned and pay attention!

Sheila Carrillo | Santa Cruz

 

Nothing to Nowhere

Perhaps to avoid the accusation that the Regional Transportation Commission has done nothing to provide community access to our rail corridor, for over a year they’ve been building a 12’ wide paved trail adjacent to the tracks on the Westside from Natural Bridges Drive (the street, not the Park) to Bay (the street, not the Bay). 

Purchased 10 years ago and still exhibiting “No Trespassing” signs, the rest of the 32-mile rail corridor remains weed and trash-strewn while the RTC has spent millions on studies and “maintenance” like removing graffiti and spraying poisonous chemicals for decayed tracks that must be replaced for any actual train. 

Now it appears that this 1.3-mile “Trail to Nowhere” will cost county taxpayers over $8 million dollars. Crossing eight blocks, it connects nothing to nowhere. How does it help solve our transportation gridlock? More to the point, why is it here?  

Ginger Jacobs | Santa Cruz

 

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Don Honda

    December 24, 2020 at 10:22 am

    My my. Sheila Carrillo has been quite busy this past week spouting a definite one-sided account of issues. Here, she uses dubious statistics and wishful thinking about CAHOOTS. For instance, it’s closer to 15% of 911 calls. Also, the police budget would have to be increased to allow for new training and new service model accompanying a response team. So much for “defunding” police. Besides the county has the CERT program.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you an earthling? Prove it with logic: *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To Top