California News

RTC Director Recommends Hard Pass on Electric Rail Proposal

RTC Director Guy Preston recommended that Santa Cruz County not move forward on an electric passenger rail, citing the high cost of ongoing maintenance

Coast Futura held demonstrations of an electric trolley system on the Santa Cruz Branch Rail Line in Watsonville and Santa Cruz last month. — Tarmo Hannula/The Pajaronian file

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY—Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission Director Guy Preston on Thursday recommended that the agency not pursue a partnership with a company hoping to provide electric passenger rail service from Capitola to Santa Cruz, citing the cost of fixing tracks and other ongoing expenses.

Preston estimated that the cost to the county would be between $50 and $60 million to prepare the tracks for passenger rail, in addition to maintenance and operations costs.

Preston also suggested that a half-cent sales tax could help to fund those repairs, if the county does pursue a passenger rail plan.

“RTC staff does not recommend pursuing this unsolicited Public Private Partnership (P3) proposal or any other potential P3 proposal for passenger rail service,” Preston wrote in a staff report.

The issue came before the Commission on Sept. 1 as an unsolicited proposal by Chatsworth, Calif.-based TIG/m LLC to run electric rail service along the county’s line. That company provided a demonstrationduring two weekends in October. 

County staff and TIG have estimated that it could take 14 years to complete plans for passenger rail.

No action was taken during the discussion, although many of the commissioners who heard Preston’s report said they hope the county does not abandon plans to eventually bring passenger rail service.

“I hope we stay open and at least continue to look for funding sources … so we can continue to seek passenger rail in the near future,” said commission alternate Felipe Hernandez, adding that he wants freight service to continue in South County.

But despite signaling that passenger rail could be a reality in the future, the commissioners appeared to agree with Preston’s financial concerns.

“We’ve gotta realize we don’t have $50-60 million to pay for the repairs we would need to move forward,” said Commissioner Bruce McPherson. “We have to be realistic in what we can do, because if we say we can do a lot with passenger rail immediately, that’s a false promise.”

McPherson also expressed concern about having to tap into the commission’s discretionary fund to pay for the repair.

Commissioner Manu Koenig, who made his opposition to passenger rail service a cornerstone of his 2020 campaign for Santa Cruz County Supervisor, said the demonstration highlighted the poor condition of the tracks.

Koenig also cited traffic tie-ups he said were caused by the demonstration, and of pedestrians walking close to the track.

“I don’t believe that rail-trail is possible,” he said. “It’s actually a physical impossibility given the physical constraints of the track.”

3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Tola

    November 12, 2021 at 9:56 pm

    We do not want local taxes to pay for a novelty train between tourist stops. We want the corridor to be used for transportation, whether that be small electric buses, eBikes, bicycles, or good ‘ol walking. Rail bank and provide the least costly, but truly effective option that works right now.

  2. Bob Fifield

    November 7, 2021 at 8:23 am

    The latest TIG demonstration showed that it could not travel faster than 10 MPH between the Boardwalk and Capitola Village. It strategically stopped a half a mile short of what should be the intention to prove its potential. This was because promoters of the for-profit TIG have already admitted that they require passengers to transfer to a more flexible vehicle (like a bus) to finish even that short trip. Rather than concealing this shortcoming, this deception emphasized this showstopper (especially to those in the know)!

    Why not use common sense by taking the opportunity to replace the outdated single railroad track with a surface useful for all? Implementing a proven more flexible (and potentially even more elegant) electric bus system that can then travel the EXACT same route upon this corridor, and then take ALL passengers directly into Capitola Village? This saves passengers a lot of time and money!

  3. Barry Scott

    November 6, 2021 at 8:39 am

    I feel the Director’s statements are premature and conflict with the findings of the most recent studies that include Public Private Partnerships as one of several forms of governance that would be investigated when the Electric Rail Business Plan is approved for further study.

    Most forms of transportation are, in fact, some form of P3. All commercial airlines, for example, use public sector funding, government air traffic controllers, and public airport facilities.
    Sports complexes are typically P3 arrangements.

    That Director Preston should prematurely limit our options before investigating them is unfortunate.

    The good news is that last month the community experienced a demonstration of hourly service in three different cities over several days, using the existing tracks, and this was achieved by the work of community partners and individuals. The vehicle was one of six included in the RTC Business Plan.

    Let’s all work together to find solutions, let’s not take any possibilities off the table!

    http://www.coastfutura.org

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you an earthling? Prove it with logic: *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To Top